Author Archive for theworldaccording2satya

25
Sep

Free RPK: It ‘aint over till it’s over!

A candle for RPK and all the other ISA detainees

A candle for RPK and all the other ISA detainees

In my last post, I mentioned that RPK’s habeas corpus petition was scheduled to be heard on Friday, the 26th of Sept, 2008. In fact, the hearing was brought forward to Tuesday, the 23rd. However, just before the hearing, RPK was charged under Section 8 of the ISA and transferred to Kamunting Detention Centre (he was previously charged under Section 73, which was why he was arrested in the first place, and (I think) detained in Bukit Aman). You can read on to see why this made any difference and how it affected the habeas petition.

Anyway, I reproduce (in full) below an article written on the 25th of Sept, by Malik Imtiaz Sarwar, RPK’s lead counsel. I found the idealism and optimism expressed therein to be truly heartening, and thus all the more necessary in these depressing times. Points of emphasis in the article are my own.

Free RPK: It’s Not Over

Let me first apologise to you for not having given you an update yesterday. It was a trying day, the culmination of a period of work and stress that began the day RPK was detained. Not just for me but for the other members of the team, in particular Ashok Kandiah and Neoh Hor Kee.

You would have read of how the application was originally fixed for the 26th of September. It was through the enormous efforts of both these lawyers that the hearing was brought forward as it was. It was also through their efforts that the necessary court papers and affidavits (statements on oath) by RPK were obtained as quickly as they were. It was primarily due to their efforts that when, as lawyers say, I got up on my hind-feet in court yesterday, we were ready to give it the best shot we could. I believe that the case we would have mounted for RPK would have been virtually unassailable.

But our attempts were impeded.

I say impeded because at this juncture we do not know whether the High Court is going to hear the original section 73 application now that the Minister has issued a detention order. A fresh application can also, and will be, filed to challenge that order. To be fair to the judge concerned, Suraya Othman J, she considered herself bound by precedent that she thought tied her hands. She acted fairly, albeit conservatively.

As much as some of us may think otherwise, RPK’s case is one of many that the judge has to deal with. We must also keep in mind that the judge has not dismissed or struck out RPK’s application even though this was what Federal Counsel sought. It is now for us to attempt to convince the judge that there is merit in proceeding with this application even though she will not be able to order the release of RPK based on this application alone. I would like to think that we still have a chance.

A second habeas corpus application will also be filed to challenge the Minister’s order. We started working on it yesterday. In truth, we are handicapped; the ISA precludes comprehensive review of such an order. Added to this is the legal position that such an order is issued by the Minister at his subjective discretion. The courts have been reluctant to interfere with the Minister’s discretion, save on procedural grounds, on the basis that, firstly, the law does not permit otherwise and secondly, the Minister knows best about national security.

This is the massive obstacle we are faced with.

This is one of the reasons why a section 73 detention is converted to a section 8 detention when the IGP is confronted with a habeas corpus application; the issuance of the Minister’s order narrows the scope of review and permits the Minister to shield himself behind a veil of national security. RPK is not the first victim of such a strategy. We experienced the same difficulty during the so-called JI detentions in late 2002.

There are however peculiarities about RPK’s detention that may give us footholds to ease our ascent. The media has reported that the Minister issued the detention order on the recommendations of the police. These pertained to the so-called anti-Islamic articles that RPK is supposed to have written. We at least know the basis of the detention and are able to bring it into focus when we get to court.

There are also no other legal tricks that can be pulled by the Ministry. The issuance of the detention order is as problematic for RPK as it can get. Some have said that this makes the detention virtually immune from challenge. I would like to think that the interests of justice can always be served if we remain hopeful of finding the path to it.

Every case in court brings us into uncharted territory and with it surprises. I have had my share. In 2001, Justice Hishamuddin ordered the release of Abdul Ghani Haroon and N Gobalakrishnan. He also prevented the police from re-arresting the two. I was in court the day he pronounced the orders and the sheer exultation I felt as he did remains with me to this day as has the awareness that there are those who will do the right thing when times seem darkest.

RPK and the other civil society leaders who have shown us the way started a process to transform this country. This legal campaign is a part of it as is the mounting civil society pressure against the ISA that have spring-boarded off his detention and that of Theresa Kok, Tan Hoong Cheng and the HINDRAF 5. RPK knew what would happen and lent himself to the process. For that reason above all, he is firmly ensconced in my mind as a patriot.

We must not lose faith. The fight has not ended, it has just begun.


MIS

18
Sep

SOS!!! Of draconian laws, unwarranted arrests, and an appeal to reason

UPDATED (20 Sept, 2008 - 12.08am)

Teresa Kok is free! :D Read her full press statement, and her description of her week-long detention under the ISA.

Anyway, that’s one down, and some 60-odd detainees to go! (By the way, RPK’s habeas corpus petition will be heard this coming Friday (26 Sept).) Sign THE PETITION to free the ISA detainees and spread the word! As I type this, 8834 people have signed. That’s not bad in such a short space of time, but we can still do better.

Meanwhile, Kickdefella has been remanded for another day. :(

UPDATED (19 Sept, 2008)

There is currently A PETITION underway to appeal for the release of RPK, Teresa Kok, and the other ISA detainees. If you feel as I feel that ISA detainees should be released immediately or tried in a court of law, then please sign the petition without delay. Spread the word far and wide. Put it up on your blogs and your Friendster and Facebook profiles. Email the link to family and friends. As I type this, there are currently 678 signatures. I know we can do a helluva lot better than this. The petition on judicial reform garnered about 25,700 signatures. We can surely equal if not better this figure.

ORIGINAL POST

Blogger Syed “Sheih Kickdefella” Azidi was arrested yesterday afternoon (17 Sept, 2008), under the Sedition Act. In the absence of better information, it seems his sedition charge is against his putting up the Malaysian flag upside down on his blog as a sign of the distressing state of affairs in this country. Earlier today, he was remanded in Kota Bahru Court and left in police custody, to go to Dang Wangi police station for “further investigation”. As you no doubt know, last Friday (12 Sept, 2008), blogger RPK, Seputeh MP Teresa Kok, and Sin Chew Daily reporter Tan Hoon Cheng were arrested under the ISA (Tan Hoon Cheng was subsequently  released on Saturday).

A candle for Sheih and all the ISA detainees
A candle for Sheih and all the ISA detainees

(Picture taken from http://www.freefoto.com/images/05/04/05_04_51—Candle_web.jpg)

I’m keeping this candle lit on my blog until Sheih and the ISA detainees are freed or get their day in court. These latest detentions are unwarranted (I suspect the same is true of Sheih’s detention, but I shall not comment in full until the police release a statement explaining reasons for the arrest). They seem to be blatant intimidation attempts to silence the press and civil society in this time of political uncertainty.

The ISA is a draconian law (and frankly so is the Sedition Act). If indeed the detainees have commited crimes, they should be charged in open court. Everyone deserves to be treated as innocent until proven guilty (I admit I’m not 100% sure about my stance on the use of the ISA on terror suspects, but at the very least we can all agree that the Act must be amended, so that they can’t be detained without trial forever). Otherwise, the government could randomly go about arresting anybody they wanted whenever they felt like it, exactly as they appear to be doing now. I pray this is not the latest round of Ops Lalang. And the worst may be yet to come. Anwar Ibrahim could be next, if the Prime Minister’s thinly veiled threat is taken seriously.

AN APPEAL TO CALM

This latest wave of arrests could perhaps be a clumsy attempt to anger us so much that we riot or take to the streets in a disorderly manner (a la May 13), instead of an attempt to silence us. BN may be itching for any excuse they can get to call emergency rule and/or suspend the Constitution to stop Anwar Ibrahim’s potential takeover of government. So let’s keep our cool and not give them the excuse they could be searching for. Any peaceful rallies that are held should be properly planned (candle-light vigils are the safest). Also, please send letters/postcards of solidarity to the ISA detainees to help lift their spirits. You can send them to:

Kamunting Detention Centre,

34600 Taiping, Perak,

Malaysia.

FREE KICKDEFELLA!
FREE KICKDEFELLA!

For is a list of all current known ISA detainees as of 13 Sept, 2008, please visit the Aliran Online webpage: http://www.aliran.com/oldsite/monthly/2001/3e.htm

18
Aug

Petition to His Majesty the Yang DiPertuan Agong: Judicial Appointments Commission

Hi all.If you wish to read THE PETITION and sign it straight away, go right ahead. And please spread the word once you’re done. If you need some convincing first, then please read on.

We all know about the VK Lingam judicial scandal. We know that a Royal Commission of Inquiry was set up to investigate this scandal. And we know that the Commission verified that our judiciary lacks proper independence. Worst of all, despite promises by the Prime Minister to reform the judiciary, and in particular, to set up a Judicial Appointments Commission, we all know nothing’s being done about it.

After the retirement of Tun Ahmad Fairuz, the former Chief Justice of Malaysia implicated in the VK Lingam scandal, Abdul Hamid Mohamad was appointed Chief Justice. He’s due to retire this October, and the word on the street is that Tan Sri Dato’ Zaki Tun Azmi will replace him.

This worries me for 3 main reasons:

  1. He has in the past been picked for promotion over several senior candidates with far more experience than he has. The same will be true if he is appointed to the most powerful position in our nation’s judiciary.
  2. He’s had intimate involvement with UMNO. He’s been their lawyer before, and no one knows whether or not he’s still a card-carrying member.
  3. He’s had significant involvement in the corporate world.


(My source of info for these concerns is the
Malaysiakini report I’ve linked here to the words “appointed” and “word on the street”.)

(Graphic taken from Malaysiakini.)

If you are deeply concerned, as I am, please read and sign THE PETITION to His Majesty the Yang DiPertuan Agong, asking for the Judicial Appointments Commission to be set up, just as the PM promised. Haris Ibrahim started this petition, just as he did the previous petition to His Majesty, asking for a Royal Commission of Inquiry. Whether or not it was because of the petition, we got our Royal Commission!

Let’s have our voices heard once more. We’ve nothing to lose and everything to gain. I don’t want to see less-than-qualified people occupying our judiciary’s top positions, and the Commission is our best chance of ensuring this in the long term.

Once you’re done signing, please spread the word to family and friends. Email your friends, post it up on your blog, or on Facebook and Friendster … please get the word out, ASAP!

Thank you.

01
May

My alma mater went to Parliament - but saw a lousy show

I want to write about something particularly important to me: debate at the Dewan Rakyat.

I was pleasantly surprised when Justin told me that my old high school, St. David’s, went to watch the first Parliamentary session (held 30th April, ‘08) since the March elections. Curious to see for myself, I followed the link he sent me, and went to read The Star’s report on the whole thing.

As the public gallery was full, this group of students from St. David's, Melaka, resorted to watching the proceedings from the public gallery entrance.

Full house: As the public gallery was full, this group of students from St. David's, Melaka, resorted to watching the proceedings from the public gallery entrance.

(Picture and caption nicked from http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2008/5/1/parliament/21119037&sec=parliament)

I received, then, an unpleasant surprise, when I read the artcile’s headline: “Live telecast may be scrapped“. The article said the Dewan Rakyat had “a circus-like atmosphere” two days ago, hence the Information Ministry would review the whole live telecast plan (my thoughts on this later).

The article went on to quote Information Minister Ahmad Shabery Cheek (BN - Kemaman) and Foreign Minister Dr Rais Yatim (BN - Jelebu), who both blamed the “circus” squarely on the Opposition, and accused them of playing to the gallery. Hmph… way to go, Star! Keep giving us both sides of the story! (To be fair, The Star did air the opinions of Opposition MPs in its video coverage, and gave them a liiiiitle space here as well.)

Anyway, I turned to other sources to get more balanced perspectives. My first stop was Malaysiakini. They had a detailed breakdown of the goings-on of the session’s question time (the first 30 minutes of which were broadcast live on RTM 1; a broadcast I sadly missed). A quick summary of what transpired:

  1. Karpal Singh (DAP - Bukit Gelugor) was upset that some MPs hadn’t raised their hands properly during the MPs’ swearing-in session on Monday, the 28th of April (a point he’d already raised on Monday). The Speaker of the House (Pandikar Amin Mulia) said he’d decided the matter and all MPs were lawfully sworn-in. A shouting match ensued where Karpal and Bung Moktar Radin (BN - Kinabatangan) resorted to name-calling.
  2. Azmin Ali (PKR - Gombak) lamented that PKR MPs weren’t allowed their fair share during question time, and the first question should have been given to Opposition Leader, Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail (PKR - Permatang Pauh). More hoo-hah errupted when the Speaker said that’s the way it was gonna be. (I should note that Azmin Ali was the model of dignity, and didn’t waste too much time after pointing out his legitimate concerns. The arguments afterward were still silly time-wasters though.)
  3. Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi (BN - Kepala Batas) took his first question from Razali Ibrahim (BN - Muar) on the government’s approach to improving Malaysians’ quality of life. More brouhaha when the Speaker disallowed any supplementary questions after the PM’s answer. Finally the PM got the Speaker to allow PAS leader Abdul Hadi Awang (PAS - Marang) a follow-up question. (Ok, I personally think this uproar was legitimate.)
  4. Further commotion took place when Ibrahim Ali (Independent - Pasir Mas) griped about (wheelchair-bound) Karpal Singh not standing up when speaking in the House.
  5. And the final (ridiculous) highlight of the day: Chong Chieng Jen (DAP - Bandar Kuching) complained about a question Bung Moktar asked because it allegedly exceeded the allowed 40 words (he says he counted 50). More childishness followed.

Three out of the above five (the exceptions perhaps being numbers 2 and 3) were petty, political cheap-shots. Actually, some of them were worse than just cheap and political. They were worthy of kindergarteners.

And what of those other sources I visited? Naturally AFP, the Times Online, the Press Association, and Reuters India had some good laughs reporting on the juvenile behaviour of our elected representatives in the August House. So yes, I wouldn’t be surprised if the St David’s students who visited Parliament two days ago were capable of more maturity than the parliamentarians they observed. A pity they had to waste their time going all the way to KL to watch an act with very little class.

Yes, I’m disappointed. I was naive enough to think there would be some significant change in the way the Dewan Rakyat was run the minute the new MPs stepped in. Clearly it’s going to take time, and the old guard Opposition MPs are as much a part of the problem as the BN people. But make no mistake: What happened in Parliament two days ago was NOTHING NEW. Parliament has certainly seen worse days. I kid thee not.

So for the Information Minister to use this as an excuse for scrapping the live telecast of parliamentary debates is completely disingenuous. He said the telecast was “grossly abused” by MPs wishing to play to the gallery for political mileage. One wonders if he’s never been to Parliament before. Otherwise this is pretence, plain and simple. An excuse, as I said, to remove the live telecast so grudgingly given.

I say that simply will not do. If ever our MPs are to feel ashamed of themselves and act with greater dignity, watching themselves on TV will do it. And if that doesn’t, little else will. The point is that it’s still our right to know how the people we put in office are representing us. Period. It’ll also serve as a good wake-up call to voters and let them realise just whom they’ve put in Parliament.

If you agree with me, then write to your MP and and tell him/her that the parliamentary telecasts should be here to stay. And tell him/her to extend the telecasts to the full 90 minutes of question time. Obviously the Prime MInister and the Information Ministry are the deciders in this matter. But at least your MP can speak up on your behalf in Parliament (and the PM and Info Ministers are both MPs as well, so…).

Don’t know who your MP is? Don’t know their address/email? Go here and check it out.

Don’t trust your MP (I don’t trust mine)? Write to MPs who will voice your concerns: bloggers like Eli Wong, Jeff Ooi, Lim Kit Siang, Wee Choo Keong, Tony Pua, Nik Azmi Nik Ahmad, Susan Loone, etc. Doesn’t matter if they’re not in your constituency.

If you like, you can send me your letter/email and I’ll put it up on this blog.

And by the way, if you needed any proof about the embarassment our Dewan Rakyat regularly is, take a look at these videos. These are but a small sample of our parliamentarians’ antics. More clips available on YouTube.


Part 1


Part 2

The above two videos show the childish exchanges in Parliament in the presence of EU observers. MPs seem to enjoy humiliating themselves and Malaysia in the eyes of the world.


Nazri Abdul Aziz’s idea of civil discourse


The now infamous “mari lawan” episode. The Opposition MPs are far from blameless, more so here than in the other videos. Notice how Lim Kit Siang’s (DAP - Ipoh Timur) important original question about the “kadar cukai yang tinggi di Kedah” is completely forgotten, not least of all by Kit Siang himself.


Part 1


Part 2

These last two videos show the even more infamous “bocor” incident.

So yes, Wednesday’s parliamentary embarassment is NO EXCUSE for depriving us of our live telecast… even if it turns out to be our least favourite show on TV.

10
Mar

Malaysia Decided 2008

      I’m breaking my vow of silence just this once. You all know what this post is about. I mean… how can I NOT blog about this?

      Malaysia held its 12th General Election on Saturday, the 8th of March, 2008. This election saw the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN or the National Front) coalition suffer its worst election defeat in Malaysian history. The Opposition denied them a two-third majority in Parliament. The final count stands at 140 seats to the ruling coalition, and 82 to the Opposition. The BN lost four states (Penang, Selangor, Kedah, and Perak) and failed to capture Kelantan from PAS (the Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party or Parti Islam Se-Malaysia). The BN of course, still form the federal government upon winning the election by a simple majority.

      Before I give you my two cents’ worth, here is some election trivia, courtesy of Malaysiakini (posted on the 10th of March, 2008):

_____________________________________________________________

Barisan Nasional only gained about 51 percent of the popular vote from the 7.9 million ballots cast on Saturday.

However, it took 63 percent of the seats contested - or 140 of 222 seats in Parliament.

(Evidence of gerrymandering, people! If you didn’t already know, that is.)

Interestingly,  its peninsula-wide popular vote was only 49.79 per cent, which effectively means that the opposition received the majority vote.

When converted to parliamentary seats, BN won 85 of the constituencies in the peninsula, while the opposition won in 80.

(More evidence of gerrymandering.)

In 2004, BN won about 64 percent of the popular vote nationwide and 92 percent of the 219 parliamentary seats on offer then.

(And still more evidence.)

As the dust settles on the 12th general election, we highlight more quirky facts and figures.

Election trivia

•    The youngest candidate was PKR’s Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad, who is 26. He defeated Seri Setia incumbent Seripa Noli Syed Hussin.

•  The oldest candidate was grandma Maimun Yusuf, 89, who contested in the Kuala Terengganu parliamentary seat.

(This is one cool granny! She has her own blog and Facebook profile! Too bad she lost.)

•    56 also-rans from opposition parties and independent candidates lost their deposits after failing to secure one-eighth of the votes cast.

•    The largest majority was won by DAP’s Teresa Kok against BN’s Carol Chew, by 36,492 votes in the Seputeh parliamentary seat in Kuala Lumpur.

•   The smallest majority was just 14 votes for BN’s Hamdi Abu Bakar who beat Abu Bakar Haji Hussain of PAS in the Pengkalan Baharu state seat in Perak.

•    Four pivotal players in the Lingam tape scandal also won: Loh Gwo Burne (who recorded the footage), Wee Choo Keong (lawyer who represented VK Lingam’s brother during the inquiry) and R Sivarasa and Sim Tze Tzin (listed as witnesses but eventually not called). All four are from PKR.

•    There will be two ‘lone rangers’ in Parliament: Zulhasnan Rafique, the sole BN survivor in Kuala Lumpur’s 11 parliamentary seats - he took Setiawangsa; and DAP’s Chong Chieng Jen who won Bandar Kuching in Sarawak - the remaining 30 parliamentary seats went to BN.   

•    The biggest number of candidates was in the Sukau state seat, Sabah, where eight candidates ran, including five Independents.

Debutant politicians

Prominent blogger Jeff Ooi - whose campaign was done online and funds were raised through his website - won the Jelutong parliamentary seat in Penang for DAP. Other bloggers are Tony Pua (DAP, Petaling Jaya Utara parliamentary seat), Elizabeth Wong (PKR, Bukit Lanjan state seat) and Nik Azmi Nik Ahmad (PKR, Seri Setia state seat).

(Another blogger turned parliamentarian is Susane Loone.)

Civil society activists who succeeded were Charles Santiago (DAP, water-privatisation issues), Edward Lee (DAP, local community), Elizabeth Wong and R Sivarasa (PKR, human rights).

Biggest blows

The losses in BN component parties will result in vacancies in various ministries, forcing a cabinet reshuffle.

Ministers:

S Samy Vellu (works ministry) (F**king FINALLY! He still refuses to step down from the post of MIC President, though. I think he’ll try to be a Senator in the Dewan Negara or something.)
Shahrizat Abdul Jalil (women, family and community development ministry)
Zainuddin Maidin (information ministry) (Another person I’m particularly glad to see go.)
Abdul Aziz Shamsuddin (rural and territory development ministry)

(Personally, I’m disappointed that Nazri Abdul Aziz is still in Parliament. Sigh!)

Deputy ministers:

Chia Kwang Chye (information ministry)
G Palanivel (women, family and community development)   
Tan Chai Ho (home ministry)

V Veerasingam (domestic trade and consumer affairs ministry)
S Sothinathan (natural resources and environment ministry)
Donald Lim (tourism ministry)
Fu Ah Kiow (internal security ministry)
M Kayveas (Prime Minister’s Department) (No more of his monkey business in Parliament.)

Parliamentary secretaries:

Chew Mei Fun (women, family and community development ministry)
P Komala Devi (education ministry)
Lee Kah Choon (health ministry)
Ng Lip Yong (plantation industries and commodities ministry)
S Vigneswaran (youth and sports ministry)
Rahman Ibrahim (home ministry)
Dr Mohd Ruddin Ab Ghani (science, technology and innovation ministry)
Yew Teong Look (federal territories ministry)

Post-election quotes

Anwar Ibrahim, PKR de facto leader, quoted in The Star today (10th of March, 2008):

"Some mentris besar in the past spent half a million ringgit to renovate their offices. Such things cannot be an example in this new administration."

(Yes, I should certainly hope not!)

Nurul Izzah Anwar, Lembah Pantai MP at a press conference yesterday (9th of March, 2008):

(On whether she will vacate the seat to force a by-election so that her father, Anwar Ibrahim, can re-enter politics after a five-year ban): "I have already started working in my constituency. The question does not arise."

PPP president M Kayveas, quoted in Star today (10th of March, 2008):

"Prior to the elections, Barisan Nasional had kept on telling people to show their dissatisfaction through the ballot box. Now they have really shown it."

(Indeed! Couldn’t have put it better myself! :D )

Sungai Petani losing BN candidate Zainuddin Maidin, quoted in Star today (10th of March, 2008):

"It is not that they love Parti Keadilan Rakyat or PAS more that they voted against me.

"The Chinese showed their resentment because of the economic backlash they often complained about. So, PAS and PKR should not be overly proud of their win (in Kedah).

"The people may have to pay a price for their decision."

(Hahahahaha! Sore loser! :D Though the first part of what he said is at least partially true, I think.)

______________________________________________________________

      Here are another two election facts that I thought were worth noting:

  1. This year’s voter turnout was about 75% - not too different from the usual voter turnout in previous elections.
  2. Prime Minister Dato’ Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi has earned the dubious honour of being the only BN leader in Malaysian history to lead the coalition to its finest election victory (2004) and its most severe election defeat (this one la) thus far. Even more striking is the fact that the two elections in question were consecutive.

      And now for my two cents’ worth.

      I spent almost the whole of Saturday night up checking Malaysiakini’s live updates as the ballots were being counted and the results were slowly coming out. I think like most people, I knew the Opposition would do well, but never expected them to win this big! I was frankly over the moon! But why do I think this is such a good thing?

      First, a stronger Opposition presence in Parliament was absolutely crucial. The BN had been winning too much for too long. And winning 92% of the seats in Parliament last election was the ultimate feather in their cap. They’d become too arrogant and were ever less concerned about the the people. The stuff listed in my previous post is evidence enough. And that was just the tip of the iceberg.

      This election result comes as a slap on their faces, delivered by the rakyat. It’s a signal that they cannot afford to ignore us any longer. But I’ll talk a bit more about that later. Anyway, a stronger Opposition presence in Parliament means a stronger check and balance on the powers that be.

      Particularly significant is that BN has been denied the two-thirds majority they’d grown so accustomed to having. This means they can’t amend the Constitution willy-nilly, since you need at least a two thirds majority vote to amend the Constitution. They’ve had no problems making amendments in the past because all BN MPs have to toe the party line or face disciplinary action.

      But just how lightly have they treated the higest law of the land? Over the past 50 years, the BN has used their (almost) unbroken two-third majority to amend the Constitution 690 times. Contrast this to the fact that the US has been independent for more than 200 years and have only amended their constitution 27 times.

      Apart from that, I hope to see some proper debate in Parliament now, before any legislation is passed. The quality of BN MPs has steadily deteriorated over the years, and with it, the quality of parliamentary debate (not that the Opposition are blameless in this). Don’t take my word for it. Go to Youtube, search for "Malaysian Parliament videos", and watch the search results in horror. Yes, I REEEEEALLY hope the standard of parliamentary debate improves with the injection of many fresh MPs, lots of whom are highly qualified professionals. Equally important is that the rakyat have sacked a slew of incompetent MPs.

      Also noteworthy is the impact that the internet and alternative media have played in this election. BERSIH, the Lingam tape, the greatly increased information about Opposition policies and stances on issues… they all started getting out to the people through websites like Malaysiakini, and blogs like Rocky’s Bru, jelas.info, Zorro Unmasked, etc. Heck, bloggers even got elected to Parliament after campaigning and raising funds online. Since they decided to go free for a week, Malaysiakini was bombarded with half a million hits an hour on Saturday night, as the election results were being announced, and had to have six mirror sites to cope with the traffic. Yes, in an age where the mainstream media has become increasingly muzzled and increasingly irrelevent, the masses have turned to cyberspace and the blogosphere to fill the void.

      But there’s one other thing I’m particularly happy about with this election: To an unprecedented extent, people stopped voting along racial lines. I wouldn’t go as far as this article here and suggest that racial politics has been shattered. No, I think unfortunately there’s still quite a way to go before that happens. But Saturday was a helluva start! People of all races voted against the BN. Otherwise it would have been impossible for Selangor especially, to fall to the Opposition.

      We were, for the first time in decades, united against a government that has wronged us all. I’d like to think that an increasing number of voters have wised up to BN’s divide and rule strategy. They’ve been playing us since 1969; pitting Malays against Chinese, all the while getting votes from a majority of at least one of those two races, and depending on the faithful Indians to always vote for them as well.

      That changed in this election. Leslie Lopez of Singapore’s The Sunday Times (9th of March, 2008, news, page 22) observed (emphasis my own):

      "As Malaysians wake up to a dramtically altered political landscape, few expect any violence.

      "That’s because the rebuke delivered to the BN wasn’t motivated by racial politics.

      "It was Malaysian."

      That, for me, is the most heartening lesson to take from this election. It also shows how powerful we can be when we’re united… what we can acheive when we stand together.

      But we can’t keep patting ourselves on the back for having the courage to vote for change. Sending out a message through the ballot box was the easy part. Now we have to hold ALL the politicians, regardless of party, true to their promises. RPK summed it up nicely in his article The Aftermath of the ‘Bloodbath’:

      "So remember who put you where you are today. Remember who gave you your job. The rakyat can hire and the rakyat can fire. We, the rakyat, made you and we, the rakyat, can break you. Just remember that and with God as our witness we shall not fail to do that if you fail to do what you promised to do."

      That’s the message we sent the BN through this election, but now we have to keep reminding the whole lot of them that this is still true. I think many people voted Opposition not because they were fantastic, but as a rebuke to the government. The Opposition have now been given a chance to prove their worth. They campaigned as the Barisan Rakyat (People’s Front).

Bara_bm_small_1

(Poster courtesy of mob1900)

      We must never let them forget they’re OUR emplyees.

      But this election also gives the BN a chance to redeem itself. After all, they still rule the country. They too should take heed of the message we’ve sent. And we should not let them forget that we’re their bosses either.

      This is a lot of hard work, naturally. But a good place ot start is the "Get to know your MP" initiative started by Haris Ibrahim. Click the link to find out more about it, and how you can get involved.

      That’s all from me now. I’ll sign off by saying here’s to a new beginning! :D